Well I watched lost yesterday and i must say it was amazing but I noticed one thing odd its about the black smoke when he attacked that white guy his actions were weird as if those of a snake (he also looked like a giant black snake) and how he presented himself sliding on the ground then sticking his head up ( almost like a rattle snake showing he is going to attack) and then i thought about it then i looked at previous attacks of the black smoke and when he attacked eko He used the actions of an elephant how he grabed eko by his trunk and swung him around and if you look closely he is almost shaped like an elephant.

After years of watching the show I made a con clusion Vincient is the black smoke he is never around when the black smoke is even the first episode we saw him once he ran off into the jungle a few hours later and the black smoke eating trees appears. and these last two episodes last week Sawyer or Locke found vincints colar next episode Boom Black smoke takes down that white french dude but of course vincient wasn't around to see it .
Heck even when jack, kate and charlie went heading into the forest I think they were headed towards the front part of the plane for the radio thing as they were walking we saw vincient watching them go down a path next thing you know they make it to the head of the plane and boom black smoke monster picks up the pilot shakes him down for his milk money then leves him in the tree. (I beileve it was the pilot episode) and also remember when Walt goes out looking for vincient well next thing you know theres a polar bear trying to get him wich had pitch black eyes almost like he was satans polar bear what i beileve is that the black smoke can take any shape or form but it must have been on the island first like Polar bears were testd on the island or ekos brother who crashed landed there first. now don't you see a pattern here Vincint = black smoke.

So what do you guys think of my theory.

0  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you find this valuable? Do you?    

Show Last Reply